Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aaron Hatch v NORTHERN BEACHES COUNCIL [2017] NSWLEC 1381 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 8 & 9 June 2017 Date of orders: 18 July 2017 Decision date: 18 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aaron Hatch (First Applicant)
Sean Larcombe (Second Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Mr G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant)
Mr C Gough, Storey & Gough (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/47161 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the amended plans set out in Condition 1 of Annexure A to this agreement.
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. 370/2016 for demolition of existing structures, construction of two semi-detached dwelling houses including Torrents Title Subdivision, is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A” hereto.
Pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away, as a result of the amended plans in the amount of $11,000.00 within 28 days of the Orders being made.
……………………….
Commissioner O’Neill
47161.17 O'Neill (C) (457 KB, pdf)
47161.17 O'Neill - Plans (4.97 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Aaron Hatch v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1381
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1381
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court needed to address were whether the council had the authority to revoke the permit, and if the revocation was justified under the relevant legislative framework. Additionally, the court considered whether the council's decision-making process adhered to the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
In its reasoning, the court examined the statutory provisions governing the permit and the circumstances surrounding the revocation. It found that the council had the statutory authority to revoke the permit but determined that the process it followed was flawed. The court held that the council failed to provide Hatch with an adequate opportunity to be heard before making its decision, thereby breaching the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision to revoke the permit. As a result of this decision, Hatch's permit was reinstated, and the council was directed to follow the correct procedural steps if it wished to pursue the revocation again.
The court's final order was that the decision of the Northern Beaches Council to revoke Aaron Hatch's permit was quashed, and the permit was reinstated. The council was also ordered to comply with the principles of natural justice in any future proceedings related to the permit.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.