[2014] FWCA 1445 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
AAA Traffic Control Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9972)
AAA TRAFFIC CONTROL PTY LIMITED EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013-2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 27 FEBRUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the AAA Traffic Control Pty Limited Employee Collective Agreement 2013-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AAA Traffic Control Pty Limited Employee Collective Agreement 2013-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by AAA Traffic Control Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Fair Work Commission received correspondence dated 27 February 2014, which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the General Manager, proposed to FWC pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).
[4] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 February 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Undertaking
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE407079 PR548227>
- AGLC
- AAA Traffic Control Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1445
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1445
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that arose involved interpreting the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009, focusing on whether the proposed changes aligned with the principles of good faith bargaining and the broader objectives of the Act. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the changes were fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both the employer and the employees.
The Commission found that the proposed amendments were in line with the principles of good faith bargaining and were fair and reasonable. The changes to shift patterns were deemed to provide necessary flexibility without adversely affecting the employees' rights. The classification adjustments were also considered appropriate, reflecting the evolving nature of the work and the skills required. The Commission approved the amended agreement, noting that the changes would benefit both the employer and the employees by providing a more adaptable and accurate reflection of the workforce's roles.
The final orders included the approval of the Employee Collective Agreement 2013-2017, with the specified amendments. The parties were directed to implement the approved agreement, and the Commission reserved jurisdiction to review any further disputes arising from the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.