4 yearly review of modern awards – plain language re-drafting – standard clauses
Case
•
[2018] FWCFB 4181
•19 JULY 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
4 yearly review of modern awards – plain language re-drafting – standard clauses [2018] FWCFB 4181
[2018] FWCFB 4181
19 JULY 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Fair Work Commission, the Department of Employment initiated a review of the modern awards, focusing on the plain language re-drafting of standard clauses. The review aimed to ensure clarity and accessibility in the language used in the awards. The Commission was tasked with assessing whether the proposed changes improved the readability and understanding of the awards for the intended audience. The nature of the dispute involved the Department of Employment's proposed amendments to various clauses within the modern awards to enhance their plain language standards.
The legal issues before the Commission included the necessity and appropriateness of the proposed changes, the extent to which the amendments aligned with the objectives of plain language drafting, and whether the changes would effectively serve the interests of the employees and employers covered by the awards. The Commission had to determine if the re-drafting maintained the integrity and enforceability of the awards while making them more comprehensible.
The Commission found that the proposed changes were generally consistent with the principles of plain language, enhancing readability and accessibility. The amendments were deemed necessary to ensure that the awards were clear and easily understood by the workforce. The Commission concluded that the re-drafting achieved its intended purpose without compromising the enforceability or fairness of the awards. As a result, the Commission approved the proposed amendments to the standard clauses.
The final orders included the approval of the revised standard clauses in the modern awards, effective from the date specified in the decision. The Department of Employment was directed to implement these changes in accordance with the Commission's determination.
The legal issues before the Commission included the necessity and appropriateness of the proposed changes, the extent to which the amendments aligned with the objectives of plain language drafting, and whether the changes would effectively serve the interests of the employees and employers covered by the awards. The Commission had to determine if the re-drafting maintained the integrity and enforceability of the awards while making them more comprehensible.
The Commission found that the proposed changes were generally consistent with the principles of plain language, enhancing readability and accessibility. The amendments were deemed necessary to ensure that the awards were clear and easily understood by the workforce. The Commission concluded that the re-drafting achieved its intended purpose without compromising the enforceability or fairness of the awards. As a result, the Commission approved the proposed amendments to the standard clauses.
The final orders included the approval of the revised standard clauses in the modern awards, effective from the date specified in the decision. The Department of Employment was directed to implement these changes in accordance with the Commission's determination.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Statutory Interpretation
-
Standard Clauses
-
Plain Language
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
4 yearly review of modern awards – plain language re-drafting – standard clauses [2018] FWCFB 4181
Most Recent Citation
Plain language redrafting of modern awards [2022] FWCFB 177
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Plain language redrafting of modern awards
[2022] FWCFB 177
Plain language redrafting of modern awards
[2022] FWCFB 177
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language – standard clauses
[2017] FWCFB 4419
4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language – standard clauses
[2017] FWCFB 3745