4 yearly review of modern awards—National Training Wage
Case
•
[2017] FWCFB 3349
•21 JUNE 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
4 yearly review of modern awards—National Training Wage [2017] FWCFB 3349
[2017] FWCFB 3349
21 JUNE 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involves the Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian Council of Trade Unions. The dispute centres on the review of the National Training Wage and its re-drafting in plain language. This matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, which is Australia's workplace relations tribunal. The Commission was tasked with ensuring that the re-drafted plain language version of the National Training Wage Schedule within the Miscellaneous Award 2010 accurately reflected the original terms and conditions of employment.
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the re-drafted plain language version of the National Training Wage Schedule accurately captured the essence and intent of the original provisions and whether any changes to the language were justified and necessary to enhance clarity and understanding. The Commission had to consider whether the re-drafting process adhered to the requirements set forth by the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly concerning the maintenance of the integrity and fairness of the original terms.
The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the submissions and evidence from both parties, determined that the re-drafted plain language version of the National Training Wage Schedule was generally consistent with the original terms and conditions. The Commission found that while some adjustments were made for clarity, they did not alter the substantive rights and obligations under the award. The Commission concluded that the re-drafting process was appropriate and that the changes were necessary to ensure that employees could easily understand their entitlements and obligations.
The Commission's decision was that the re-drafted version of the National Training Wage Schedule within the Miscellaneous Award 2010 was approved as it stood, with the understanding that any future amendments would be subject to the same rigorous review process. The Commission also outlined the next steps for the implementation and communication of the updated award to ensure all stakeholders were adequately informed and could comply with the new provisions.
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the re-drafted plain language version of the National Training Wage Schedule accurately captured the essence and intent of the original provisions and whether any changes to the language were justified and necessary to enhance clarity and understanding. The Commission had to consider whether the re-drafting process adhered to the requirements set forth by the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly concerning the maintenance of the integrity and fairness of the original terms.
The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the submissions and evidence from both parties, determined that the re-drafted plain language version of the National Training Wage Schedule was generally consistent with the original terms and conditions. The Commission found that while some adjustments were made for clarity, they did not alter the substantive rights and obligations under the award. The Commission concluded that the re-drafting process was appropriate and that the changes were necessary to ensure that employees could easily understand their entitlements and obligations.
The Commission's decision was that the re-drafted version of the National Training Wage Schedule within the Miscellaneous Award 2010 was approved as it stood, with the understanding that any future amendments would be subject to the same rigorous review process. The Commission also outlined the next steps for the implementation and communication of the updated award to ensure all stakeholders were adequately informed and could comply with the new provisions.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
National Training Wage Schedule
-
Wage Review
-
Award System
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Plain language redrafting of modern awards [2022] FWCFB 177
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Plain language redrafting of modern awards
[2022] FWCFB 177
4 yearly review of modern awards—National Training Wage
[2017] FWCFB 4174
Plain language redrafting of modern awards
[2022] FWCFB 177
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
4 yearly review of modern awards—National Training Wage
[2017] FWCFB 3176
4 yearly review of modern awards—National Training Wage
[2017] FWCFB 1095
4 yearly review of modern awards—National Training Wage
[2017] FWCFB 3176