4 yearly review of modern awards–Children’s Services Award 2010 – Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010 – Substantive Issues

Case [2019] FWC 3050


[2019] FWC 3050
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT


Fair Work Act 2009

s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards

4 yearly review of modern awards–Children’s Services Award 2010 – Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010 – Substantive Issues
(AM2018/18 and AM2018/20)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

MELBOURNE, 6 MAY 2019

Children's Services Award 2010 - substantive issues Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010 - substantive issues.

[1] This Statement deals with the hearing of the substantive claims to vary the Children’s Services Award 2010 (the Children’s Services Award) and the Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010 (the Teachers Award). The hearing is scheduled for Monday 6 May to Thursday 9 May 2019.

[2] A Statement issued on 29 April 2019 attached a list of the claims which are the subject of this week’s hearing. The list of substantive claims in the Children’s Services Award was at Attachment A and the list of substantive claims in the Teachers Award is at Attachment B.

[3] On 2 May 2019 the Commission received an email from United Voice identifying some inaccuracies in Attachments A and B of the 29 April 2019 Statement. These inaccuracies have now been corrected and the revised Attachments A and B are attached to this document.

PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR707950>

ATTACHMENT A – List of substantive claims in the Children’s Services Award 2010

United Voice seek to vary the award by:

  introducing a training allowance;

  inserting a note under the clothing and equipment allowance clause regarding on site laundry facilities;

  inserting the words “hat, sun protection (including sunscreen lotions)” into the clothing and equipment allowance clause 15.2(c);

  deleting the higher duties clause or alternatively, amending it to remove the words “(including in-service training)”;

  reducing the maximum amount of leave without pay for a Christmas close down from 4 to 2 weeks;

  amending clauses 24.4(b) and (c) by:

    - providing that an employee directed to take annual leave during the Christmas vacation who does not have sufficient accrued leave will be paid ‘the ordinary rate of pay during such a period’; and
    - inserting the word ‘paid’ before annual leave in clause 24.4(c).

  introducing the following allowances: a weekly allowance for an employee appointed as an educational leader; an hourly allowance for a responsible person physically present at a child care centre; a programming and administrative tasks allowance for children service employees that are required to perform additional programming and administrative duties in addition to their rostered hours and

  amending clause 21.5(a) to increase the non-contact time clause by extending non-contact time to 8 from 2 to 4 hours per week for employees responsible for the preparation, implementation and/or evaluation of a developmental program.

  inserting a new clause 21.5(b) to provide non-contact time for Educational Leaders (2 hours per week in centres licensed for more than 39 places; 3 hours per week for centres licensed for 40-59 places and 4 hours per week for centres licensed for 60 and above places).

The Australian Childcare Alliance, Australian Business Industrial and the New South Wales Business Chamber seek to vary the award by:

  amending the ordinary hours of work and the rostering clause to provide employers with greater flexibility to change rosters other than with 7 days’ notice and to allow ordinary hours to be worked before 6.00 am or after 6.30 pm.

An Individual seek to vary the award by:

  insertion of an Educational leadership allowance for employees with educational leadership responsibilities in early childhood education and care settings and

  insertion of a Responsible Person allowance.

Business SA seek to vary the award by:

  amending the casual employment clause by removing the restriction on employing casuals for temporary and relief purposes.

ATTACHMENT B – List of substantive claims in the Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010

United Voice seeks to introduce the following allowances:

  a weekly allowance for employee appointed as educational leader;

  an hourly allowance for responsible person physically present at a child care centre;

  amending clause 21.5(a) to increase the non-contact time clause by extending non-contact time to 8 from 2 to 4 hours per week for employees responsible for the preparation, implementation and/or evaluation of a developmental program; and

  inserting a new clause 21.5(b) to provide non-contact time for Educational Leaders (2 hours per week in centres licensed for more than 39 places; 3 hours per week for centres licensed for 40-59 places and 4 hours per week for centres licensed for 60 and above places).

An individual seeks to vary the award by:

  extending the Leadership allowance to teachers with educational leadership responsibilities in early childhood education and care settings;

  including a Responsible person allowance

ACA and ABI & NSWBC seek to vary the award by:

  providing employers with greater flexibility to change rosters;

  allowing ordinary hours in the children's services and early childhood industry to be worked after 6.30pm.

Independent Education Union of Australia seeks:

  a variation to the definition of “teacher” to ensure the award covers teachers employed as Directors;

  a variation to the award to ensure teachers are only paid the quarter day rate when employed for less than two hours and, correspondingly, paid the half day rate when employed for less than 3.8 hours;

  a variation to the award to cap, at 205, the number of days teachers in distance education can be required to teach.

Details
AGLC
4 yearly review of modern awards–Children’s Services Award 2010 – Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010 – Substantive Issues [2019] FWC 3050
Case
[2019] FWC 3050
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Australian Education Union and others sought to have the 4 yearly review of the Children’s Services Award 2010 and the Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010 conducted, arguing that the economic and social climate had changed since the awards were made. The respondents, including the Australian Government and others, opposed the application. The central legal issue before the commission was whether the changes in the economic and social environment since the awards were made were significant enough to warrant a substantive review. The commission had to determine whether the awards should be revised to reflect the changes in the conditions of employment in the relevant industries.

The commission found that while there had been some changes in the economic and social environment since the awards were made, they were not significant enough to warrant a substantive review. The commission held that the awards were still fit for purpose and that the changes could be addressed through the existing mechanisms for reviewing and varying the awards. The commission also noted that a substantive review would be a significant undertaking and would have broader implications for the industrial relations system. The commission concluded that the changes did not amount to a substantial change in the conditions of employment and that the awards should remain as they were.

In light of the above, the commission dismissed the application for a 4 yearly review of the awards. The commission held that the awards were still valid and that there was no need for a substantive review at this time. The commission noted that the parties could still seek to vary the awards through the existing mechanisms for reviewing and varying the awards. The decision provides clarity on the threshold for a substantive review of awards and confirms that such reviews are only warranted in cases of significant changes in the conditions of employment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.