4 yearly review of modern awards—Air Pilots Award 2010
Case
•
[2020] FWCFB 929
•21 FEBRUARY 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
4 yearly review of modern awards—Air Pilots Award 2010 [2020] FWCFB 929
[2020] FWCFB 929
21 FEBRUARY 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Australian Industrial Relations Commission was tasked with conducting the four-yearly review of the Air Pilots Award 2010. The dispute arose from the application by the Australian and International Pilots Association (AIPA) seeking changes to the award, particularly focusing on the classification and remuneration of air pilots. The Commission, comprising of a Deputy President and two Members, convened to assess the submissions and determine whether variations to the award were warranted.
The legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation and application of the applicable industrial legislation, specifically the Fair Work Act 2009. Key issues included whether the proposed changes to Schedule C of the Air Pilots Award 2010 were substantively justified and whether they adhered to the principles of industrial fairness and the broader economic context. The Commission also had to consider the impact of the proposed changes on various stakeholders, including employers and employees within the aviation industry.
After considering the evidence and submissions presented by both parties, the Commission concluded that some of the proposed changes were substantively justified. The Deputy President found that certain classifications and remuneration adjustments were necessary to reflect changes in the industry and to ensure the award remained fair and relevant. However, not all proposed changes were accepted, with some deemed either unsupported by the evidence or not in line with the principles of industrial fairness. The Commission carefully balanced the interests of both parties, ultimately determining variations to Schedule C that reflected a fair and reasonable outcome.
The final orders included specific amendments to the Air Pilots Award 2010, as outlined in the decision. These amendments addressed the classification and remuneration of air pilots, providing clarity and certainty to the parties involved. The decision underscores the importance of a thorough review process, ensuring that modern awards continue to meet the needs of the contemporary workplace while maintaining industrial fairness.
The legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation and application of the applicable industrial legislation, specifically the Fair Work Act 2009. Key issues included whether the proposed changes to Schedule C of the Air Pilots Award 2010 were substantively justified and whether they adhered to the principles of industrial fairness and the broader economic context. The Commission also had to consider the impact of the proposed changes on various stakeholders, including employers and employees within the aviation industry.
After considering the evidence and submissions presented by both parties, the Commission concluded that some of the proposed changes were substantively justified. The Deputy President found that certain classifications and remuneration adjustments were necessary to reflect changes in the industry and to ensure the award remained fair and relevant. However, not all proposed changes were accepted, with some deemed either unsupported by the evidence or not in line with the principles of industrial fairness. The Commission carefully balanced the interests of both parties, ultimately determining variations to Schedule C that reflected a fair and reasonable outcome.
The final orders included specific amendments to the Air Pilots Award 2010, as outlined in the decision. These amendments addressed the classification and remuneration of air pilots, providing clarity and certainty to the parties involved. The decision underscores the importance of a thorough review process, ensuring that modern awards continue to meet the needs of the contemporary workplace while maintaining industrial fairness.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Variation of Terms
-
Substantial Change
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
4 yearly review of modern awards—Air Pilots Award 2010 [2020] FWCFB 929
Cases Citing This Decision
4
4 yearly review of modern awards—Air Pilots Award 2020
[2020] FWCFB 5555
4 yearly review of modern awards—Air Pilots Award 2010
[2020] FWCFB 825
4 yearly review of modern awards—Air Pilots Award 2020
[2020] FWCFB 5555
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
4 yearly review of modern awards
[2018] FWC 6107
4 yearly review of modern awards
[2018] FWC 6107