2200337 (Refugee)
Case
•
[2022] AATA 1970
•19 May 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
2200337 (Refugee) [2022] AATA 1970
[2022] AATA 1970
19 May 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant sought review of a decision concerning a protection visa for entry into Thailand. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) was asked to consider the delegate's decision.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it possessed jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision, given that the decision had previously been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal.
Member C. Packer reasoned that once a delegate's decision has undergone a valid review by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a "reviewable decision" for the purposes of further review. Consequently, the Tribunal's jurisdiction in relation to that specific decision is extinguished.
The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it possessed jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision, given that the decision had previously been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal.
Member C. Packer reasoned that once a delegate's decision has undergone a valid review by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a "reviewable decision" for the purposes of further review. Consequently, the Tribunal's jurisdiction in relation to that specific decision is extinguished.
The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
2200337 (Refugee) [2022] AATA 1970
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
SZBWJ v MIAC
[2008] FMCA 164
SZASP v MIAC
[2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC
[2008] FMCA 164