2101600 (Refugee)

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered an application for protection visas by applicants from India. The core of the dispute concerned whether the applicants met the eligibility criteria for a protection visa, specifically the requirement of being present in Australia.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicants satisfied the criterion under section 36(2) of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) that they be a non-citizen in Australia. This criterion is a prerequisite for the grant of a protection visa.

The Tribunal reasoned that a protection visa can only be granted if the applicant is physically present in Australia. Movement records indicated that the applicants had departed Australia in March and April 2023. The Tribunal notified the applicants of this information and invited them to respond, but no response was received. Consequently, the Tribunal was satisfied that the applicants were not in Australia, and therefore did not meet the essential criterion under section 36(2) of the Act. As this criterion was not met, the Tribunal concluded it was unnecessary to consider the substantive claims for protection. The Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the protection visas.