2100594 (Refugee)

Case

[2021] AATA 2636

11 June 2021


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
2100594 (Refugee) [2021] AATA 2636 [2021] AATA 2636 11 June 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant sought review of a decision made by the delegate of the Minister. The dispute concerned whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) had jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision, given that a previous application for review of the same decision had already been completed. The decision was made by Member Steven Griffiths of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it retained jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision when that decision had previously been the subject of a completed review. This question turned on the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) and the *Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975* (Cth) concerning the finality of reviewable decisions.

Member Griffiths reasoned that once a decision has been validly reviewed by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a "reviewable decision" for the purposes of further applications for review. The Tribunal's jurisdiction is limited to reviewing decisions that are currently reviewable. As the delegate's decision had already undergone a completed review, it was no longer a reviewable decision, and therefore the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain a subsequent application for review in relation to that same decision.

Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that it did not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Immigration

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Judicial Review

  • Res Judicata

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

0

SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164
SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164