1923311 (Migration)
Case
•
[2022] AATA 2428
•27 June 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
1923311 (Migration) [2022] AATA 2428
[2022] AATA 2428
27 June 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered an application for a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa, Subclass 801 (Spouse). The applicant sought to have the decision reviewed on the basis that their relationship with the sponsor had ceased due to family violence.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the applicant had suffered family violence committed by the sponsor, within the meaning of the *Migration Regulations 1994*. This involved assessing whether the evidence presented satisfied the requirements for a non-judicially determined claim of family violence, as defined by the Regulations, and whether any such violence occurred during the relationship.
The Tribunal found that a genuine partner relationship had existed between the applicant and the sponsor, and that this relationship had ceased. Crucially, the Tribunal was satisfied that the applicant had suffered relevant family violence committed by the sponsor, based on the evidence provided, which included statutory declarations meeting the requirements of the Regulations for a non-judicially determined claim. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant met the criteria under cl.801.221(6)(b) and (c) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application for a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa for reconsideration by the Minister, with the direction that the applicant had satisfied the specified criteria for a Subclass 801 visa.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the applicant had suffered family violence committed by the sponsor, within the meaning of the *Migration Regulations 1994*. This involved assessing whether the evidence presented satisfied the requirements for a non-judicially determined claim of family violence, as defined by the Regulations, and whether any such violence occurred during the relationship.
The Tribunal found that a genuine partner relationship had existed between the applicant and the sponsor, and that this relationship had ceased. Crucially, the Tribunal was satisfied that the applicant had suffered relevant family violence committed by the sponsor, based on the evidence provided, which included statutory declarations meeting the requirements of the Regulations for a non-judicially determined claim. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant met the criteria under cl.801.221(6)(b) and (c) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application for a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa for reconsideration by the Minister, with the direction that the applicant had satisfied the specified criteria for a Subclass 801 visa.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Natural Justice
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
1923311 (Migration) [2022] AATA 2428
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0