1900772 (Refugee)

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered an application for a protection visa made by a non-citizen. The dispute centred on whether the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the visa, specifically the requirement of being present in Australia.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant satisfied the criterion that they be a non-citizen in Australia, as stipulated by section 36(2) of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth), which is a prerequisite for the grant of a protection visa under section 65(1) of the Act.

The Tribunal reasoned that movement records indicated the applicant had departed Australia in February 2023. Despite being notified of this information and invited to comment, the applicant did not respond. Consequently, the Tribunal was satisfied that the applicant was not in Australia, and therefore did not meet the essential criterion under section 36(2) of the Act. As this criterion was not met, the Tribunal concluded it was unnecessary to consider the applicant's substantive claims for protection. The Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the protection visa.