1813906 (Refugee)
Case
•
[2018] AATA 2776
•19 June 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
1813906 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 2776
[2018] AATA 2776
19 June 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant sought review of a decision concerning a protection visa. The application for review was lodged with the Tribunal on 14 May 2018.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it had jurisdiction to consider the application for review, given that it was lodged outside the prescribed time limit.
The Tribunal Member, Nathan Goetz, determined that the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislative requirements because it was received by the Tribunal on 14 May 2018, which was after the statutory deadline. Consequently, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter.
The Tribunal made no orders as it determined it did not have jurisdiction.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it had jurisdiction to consider the application for review, given that it was lodged outside the prescribed time limit.
The Tribunal Member, Nathan Goetz, determined that the application for review was not made in accordance with the relevant legislative requirements because it was received by the Tribunal on 14 May 2018, which was after the statutory deadline. Consequently, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter.
The Tribunal made no orders as it determined it did not have jurisdiction.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
1813906 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 2776
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0