1812180 (Refugee)
Case
•
[2018] AATA 2589
•22 May 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
1812180 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 2589
[2018] AATA 2589
22 May 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant sought review of a decision concerning a protection visa. The delegate's decision had previously been reviewed by the Tribunal.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it retained jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision, given that it had already been the subject of a prior review.
The Tribunal reasoned that once a decision has been validly reviewed by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a reviewable decision. Consequently, the Tribunal no longer possesses jurisdiction in relation to that specific decision. The Tribunal therefore concluded it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it retained jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision, given that it had already been the subject of a prior review.
The Tribunal reasoned that once a decision has been validly reviewed by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a reviewable decision. Consequently, the Tribunal no longer possesses jurisdiction in relation to that specific decision. The Tribunal therefore concluded it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
1812180 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 2589
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
SZBWJ v MIAC
[2008] FMCA 164
SZASP v MIAC
[2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC
[2008] FMCA 164