1729575 (Refugee)

Case

[2018] AATA 1516

14 February 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
1729575 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 1516 [2018] AATA 1516 14 February 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant sought a review of a delegate's decision concerning protection. The respondent was the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) was asked to determine whether it had jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision.

The central legal issue before the AAT was whether it retained jurisdiction to review a delegate's decision when that same decision had already been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal.

The AAT reasoned that once a delegate's decision has been validly reviewed by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a "reviewable decision" for the purposes of the relevant legislation. Consequently, the Tribunal's jurisdiction in relation to that specific decision is extinguished. The AAT applied the principle that a matter, once finally determined by a competent tribunal, cannot be relitigated.

The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Judicial Review

  • Res Judicata

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

0

SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164
SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164