1722221 (Refugee)
Case
•
[2018] AATA 1433
•12 April 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
1722221 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 1433
[2018] AATA 1433
12 April 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant sought review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister regarding a protection visa. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) considered whether it had jurisdiction to hear the application.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it retained jurisdiction to review a delegate's decision that had already been the subject of a previous, valid review by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal reasoned that once a delegate's decision has been validly reviewed by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a "reviewable decision" for the purposes of further review. Consequently, the Tribunal determined that it no longer possessed jurisdiction to entertain a subsequent application for review concerning that same decision.
The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction in this matter.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it retained jurisdiction to review a delegate's decision that had already been the subject of a previous, valid review by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal reasoned that once a delegate's decision has been validly reviewed by the Tribunal, it ceases to be a "reviewable decision" for the purposes of further review. Consequently, the Tribunal determined that it no longer possessed jurisdiction to entertain a subsequent application for review concerning that same decision.
The Tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
-
Res Judicata
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
1722221 (Refugee) [2018] AATA 1433
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
SZBWJ v MIAC
[2008] FMCA 164
SZASP v MIAC
[2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC
[2008] FMCA 164